Landing  Explorer Post 1010
Lockheed Martin Exploring Program
Launch - March 17, 2013
Rover

Six members from all three teams traveled to the Virginia launch site on Sunday, March 17. It was cold (36f), overcast, but very little wind. After the first test launch, it started to rain and then snow, and the wind picked up a little. We used the 7ft launch rail for all the launches.

It is clear, low wind speed means better flights. Light precipitation didn't seem to hurt too much, except the rockets got very wet. We stopped the launches because of the unknown effect of wet streamers and parachutes.

We have one more weekend in March to finish our qualification launches.

Objectives

  • Each team wanted to do one test launch and one qualifying launch.
Yellow Rocket Red Rocket Orange Rocket

Team 13256Lessons

  • All three teams had a good first test launches. They went straight in windless conditions. Their altitudes were consistent with their weight. Team 13254's yellow rocket flew too high at 378g, so a suggested target weight would be about 385g to 390g Team 13255's red rocket flew a little too high at 392g, so a suggested target weight would be about 396g to 400g. Team 13256's orange rocket flew just right at 378/382g. so their target weight should be 380g.
  • We used recent purchased E20-7W with larger igniters in the package. We still had igniters spitting before they ignited the propellant. In looking at the igniters before launch, I believe they were all placed correctly. We have no correction for spitting.
  • The descent times were all long except for the launch in the blowing snow. The spill holes seemed to reduce oscillation and control the descent. Team 13254's yellow rocket needs a slightly larger spill hole. Team 13255's red rocket needs a spill hole around 2-3 inches. Team 13256's orange rocket parachute seems to be just about right.
  • Team 13256's orange rocket didn't deploy the streamer on their first flight. The tape between the streamer and the chute was not tight enough and the chute protector plug didn't push out the streamer. We have never had the streamer and chute get entangled, or have the tape stay connected, so making it too tight is less risky than making it too loose.
  • All rockets were recovered, no eggs were broken, good job.

Launches

Rocket Engine Rail Cargo Cargo
Recovery
Booster Recovery Weight Results Comments
Yellow test 1
Team 13254
no video
E20-7W 1d 1 egg,
altimeter 1
15" Round,
2" spill
6x60" Streamer 378g 789ft, 57sec Flew straight
Red test 1
Team 13255
video
E20-7W 1d 1 egg,
altimeter 2
15" Round 6x60" Streamer 392g 778ft, 54sec Flew straight
Red test 2
Team 13255
video
E20-7W 1d wood egg,
altimeter 2
15" Round,
3" spill
6x60" Streamer 400g 722ft, 50sec Flew into wind a little
(flew March 20)
Orange test 1
Team 13256
video
E20-7W 1d 1 egg,
altimeter 3
15" Round,
2" spill
6x60" Streamer 378g 753ft, 50sec Flew straight, streamer didn't deploy
Orange test 2
Team 13256
video
E20-7W 1d 1 egg,
altimeter 3
15" Round,
2" spill
6x60" Streamer 382g 745ft, 44.90sec Flew into wind a little
Qualification Score: 17.40

Altimeter Data (Excel format)
Altimeter Data Chart

Following the curtailed launch on Sunday, we went out to try a launch with a 3in spill hole on the 13255's red rocket parachute. We also increased the weight of the rocket to 400g. We traveled to National Pike Park on Wednesday, March 20. The wind was light and temperature was about 40F. The launch was a little into the wind because the launch rail was not angled enough, but recovery was normal. The large spill hole had almost no effect on the descent rate.

Altimeter Data - (two red rocket launches)
Altimeter Data Chart

Copyright 2013 Lockheed Martin Exploring Program
Updated: March 18, 2013